I am in the competitive academic world. There are many highly-respected names in
my field. However, if they behave like a 5-year-old child, they become very ugly.
Click here for a beautiful story about a son of my friend.
Two Ugly Men in Physics
They were well-respected physicists, but I have to say
they are like beasts (without culture)
if they say my papers are wrong without providing proofs.
Arthur Wightman and Louis Michel
- Arthur Wightman
and
Louis Michel were two of the most respected mathematical physicists
during the latter half of the 20th Century. Their names were mentioned in
the English version of Wigner's book entitled "Group Theory and Atomic Spectra."
However, they did not know they were not big enough to say "any paper is wrong" without
providing proof.
- When I was a student at Princeton (1961), I was in Wightman's class on the Lorentz
group, where he gave lectures based on
Wigners's 1939 paper on the same subject.
- Louis Michel visited the University of Maryland in 1970 for one semester giving
lectures on Wigner's 1939 paper. I attended all of his lectures, and I organized a
small dinner meeting honoring him.
From their point of view, I had to get their permissions before approaching Wigner.
From my point of view, I met Wigner while I was a student at Princeton, and I used to
talk with him on various issues. I did not feel I needed permissions from anyone for
contacting Wigner.
- While I was a student at Princeton, I enjoyed talking with Wigner, on various issues
including the communist threats from the Soviet Union. He came from Hungary, and
I came from Korea. We did not like what Soviet communists did to Hungary and to Korea.
Needless to say, my most important conversation with Wigner was on
his 1939 paper on the Lorentz group.
- As soon as I started publishing papers with Wigner in 1987, Michel and Wightman
started behaving like King Herod:
Wigner was theirs. How can anyone other than themselves publish papers with him?
This person should be eliminated.
Wightman was unhappy with this table:
Contents of Einstein's E = mc2
|
Particle |
Massive/Slow |
between |
Massless/Fast |
|
| Einstein |
Energy Momentum |
E = p2/2m |
E = [m2c4 + (cp)2]1/2 |
E = cp |
|
| Wigner |
Helicity Spin, Gauge |
S3 S1
S2
|
Wigner's 1939 paper |
Helicity Gauge Trans.
|
|
included in a paper I published with my younger colleagues in 1986.
- Wightman
told me this table is incorrect. Since his office and Wigner's office were in
the same physics building on the campus of Princeton University, Wightmsn must
have told the same story to Wigner, but Wigner stood with me.
Wigner understood this table, while Wightman did not. Wigner was very happy with
me because this table tells his coordinate in Einstein's scientific genealogy.
Wightman knew me well. Before telling anyone this table is wrong, he should have
asked me to explain how I arrived at this table. He thought this table would become
wrong if he stamped so. He was not a civilized person.
-
Louis Michel was a highly respected French mathematical physicist, and I was
always polite to him when I met him. I even organized a small party honoring him when
he visited the University of Maryland. However, it was totally unacceptable to him when
I was publishing papers with Wigner without his permission.
He wrote a letter to the president of my university to fire me because I was publishing
wrong papers with Wigner. However, the president was very happy with me because Wigner
was visiting the University at my invitation. Michel's letter became a big joke not only
to me but also to the president of my university.
- Michel and Wightman thought the above table was wrong because their names were not
there.
They did not know about themselves.
They were famous, but not wise enough to hide their lack of competence.
- Furthermore, they were more than 10 years older than I was. They grew up in the Western
world where the people with non-white skins appeared inferior. This kind of mentality still
exists in the academic world, perhaps to lesser extent.
It is very safe to say that Michel and Wightman were the victims of their own outdated racism.
|
|