Soviet Tanks and American Tanks


J. Walter Christie

Do you know who Walter Christie was? He was an American engineer born in 1865 and died in 1944. He invented the T-34 tank, but his invention was not appreciated by Americans. He was penniless when he died.

Do you know who invented battle tanks? The concept of steel-armored battle vehicles was developed during World War I by British army engineers. Those first-generation tanks were very ugly-looking. After the war, as the automobiles became more sophisticated, and tractors and bulldozers became the standard tools for agriculture and industry, battle tanks started taking their shape.

However, it was a difficult to develop tracked vehicles which can move at the speed of automobiles. Tractors and bulldozers can move slowly, but tanks should run fast. Walter Christie the person who invented this machine. By 1920, America had a solid industrial base for automobiles. Christie found out the problem was with the suspension system, and developed the concept of each wheel having its own independent suspension system. In this way, the tank can maintain its stability while moving as fast as cars or trucks.

However, the American army bureaucracy did not understand this simple mechanism, and rejected Christie's new idea. As a consequence, Christie sold his technology to Poland and the Soviet Union. At that time, Russia was not a dangerous country to the United States, and American authorities did not care too much about Christie's petty project.

Using Christie's invention, Soviets developed their own tanks. The first tank in the Christie series is called the T-34 model. To Russians, Model T-34 was the savior of their country during their "Great Patriotic War" (World War II). If you meet Russian ladies and like to continue talks with them, mention T-34. This turn them on. Indeed, my tank page starts with photos of this T-34 tank.

These T-34 tanks are very important to Koreans. We all agree that the Korean War (1950-3) was the most significant event in Korea's recent history. On June 25 (1950), Kim Il-Sung started this war by sending 180 Soviet-built T-34 tanks across the 38th parallel near Dong-Du-Chun. These tanks destroyed the (south) Korean army in three days, and marched into Seoul on June 29.

Perhaps I am the first person to (almost) hear about those North Korean tanks. On June 4, three weeks before the 6.25 day, I accompanied my father who was one of the inspectors who went to the Dong-Du-Chun front to see what was going on there. He was a high-ranking officer in Korea's defense ministry in charge of supplies.

These inspectors were interested what the troops needed to perform their front-line duties. They asked the field commanders what they needed most. The answer was that they needed ammunition for their US-made M-1 rifles. They said they did not have enough ammo even for target practices.

The inspectors asked another important question. What was going on the other side of the 38th parallel. The answer was that everything is quiet and normal, but they are building a road toward the south at an unusual speed. The inspectors asked why? The field commanders said they have no ideas. Then the answer was dismissed. Perhaps I am the only person who can recollect this moment.

On June 25, I was tuned to KBS's daytime program which lasted for one hour from 12:00 to 1:00 PM. The radio told us the broadcasting would be extended beyond 1:00 PM and advised to stay tuned. At 1:10 PM, the radio announced the North Korean "Puppet" army crossed the 38th parallel, and tanks were coming along the Dong-Du-Chun route toward Seoul. I was able to relate those tanks with the road the North Korean troops were constructing three weeks before. They were hidden at a place sufficiently far away from the front line.

There are some lessons to learn from this story.

  1. The Korean (south)army was equipped with semi-automatic M-1 rifles with 8 rounds, while North Korean troops used hand-cocked Mosin-Nagant rifles with five rounds. Thus, the South had superior rifles, but rifles are quite irrelevant against tanks. To the South, tanks were beyond their scope and imagination.

  2. Koreans were the not the first ones to make this kind of mistake. When Japanese army attempted to invade Mongolia in 1939, they thought their new rifles with diameter 7.7 mm (known as 99 siki) were much superior to their old rifles with 6.5 mm (known as 38 siki). But those war makers did not know that Soviets has tanks which were early versions of T-34. The Japanese army got completely destroyed, and their generals were ordered to commit Harakiri (cutting their own abdomens).

    Koreans (south) did not have enough military professionalism to learn lessons from this incident.

  3. Let us come back to Walter Christie who invented the Soviet T-34 tank. American military literature and mass media all tell he had a bad personality and was not able to get along with anyone (perhaps like me). This is the reason why Americans did not use his technology. I do not think it is a correct logic. One's personality cannot be the reason for rejecting his technology. It is more likely the fault of out-dated army bureaucracy.

    In July of 1950, the first group of Americans came to Korea to stop those North Korean T-34 tanks. Americans fired their anti-tank guns and hit those tanks, but nothing happened. To make things worse, the NK tanks did not have enough courtesy of greeting Americans by firing back.

  4. To make things much worse, those T-34 tanks destroyed the 24th Division of the U.S. Army in the Daejon battle in July of 1950, and its Division commander was captured by North Koreans. The NK army, inaugurated in February of 1948, was only two years old at that time. This was perhaps the worst humiliation the U.S. Army suffered in it history. It was indeed tragic that one American elite division was destroyed by the military machine invented by an American engineer. Sometimes, bureaucracy could be a country's worst enemy, even for the United States.
It is not difficult to see that this article was written by a person who thoroughly hates bureaucracy, with some personal experience of his own. As a consequence, the article contains an exaggeration, which was pointed out by the following e-mail.


copyright@2008 by Y. S. Kim, unless otherwise specified.

Like to know about this fellow? Click here.