John A. Wheeler as a Cartoonist

Wheeler in Moscow (1991).
In 1977, the University of Maryland awarded honorary doctoral degrees to five distinguished Americans. Among them were Herbert Block and John A. Wheeler. You all know who Wheeler was. Do you know who Block was?

Herbert Block was a political cartoonist who served eleven United States presidents from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush. He is widely known as "Herblock."
Click here for some of his cartoons in the Library of Congress collection.

Herblock got his honorary degree in "humane literature," and Wheeler's degree was in "science." After reading a newspaper article about their degrees, I complained to Jim Griffin. He said "Yes, Wheeler is also a great cartoonist." We agreed that Wheeler and Herblock should have receceived their degrees in the same category. For Wheeler's cartoons, look at his books.

James J. Griffin (photo 2008) got his PhD degree from Princeton in 1956. He was Wheeler's student. He and Wheeler drew many cartoons while doing physics. He regrets he did not keep them all.

Feynman (1986), from AIP Emilio Segre Visual Archives.
As for the degrees, it was too late for me to complain to University authorities about their failure to see the common ground for Wheeler and Herblock. But I knew that I would have a chance to present the case at a later date. This is precisely the purpose of this webpage. It seems to be much easier and far more effective to present my views to internet than to bureaucracy.

When I was a graduate student at Princeton (1958-61), John A. Wheeler was the most talked-about professor. He was always drawing pictures. He drew many pictures on the blackboard, but the most strange pictures were those of worm holes.

The blackboard pictures are cartoons. Princeton's graduate students know Feynman was Wheeler's student before accepting their admissions. After seeing Wheeler's instinct to draw cartoons, graduate students of my time made up a story that Feynman picked up his habit of drawing diagrams from Wheeler. This story could even be true. If this is the case, the art of drawing Feynman diagrams can be traced to Wheeler.

This culture got transmitted very easily to Feynman because Feynman was also a great cartoonist. He used to draw pictures on the back of an envelope whenever he was thinking about physics problems. In restaurants, he was fond of drawing pictures of girls on napkins. Recognizing his own talent along this direction, Feynman in his later years hired two art instructers to become an artisit. I have a webpage entitled Feynman as an Arist

Not everybody has picture-drawing talent. Do you know how to draw pictures? I certainly do not. Can you still join the picture-loving club of Wheeler and Feynman? How? The answer is to understand the process in which these two great cartoonists produced their pictures. You already know how Feynman diagrams are constructed. Organize physics first. Then start drawing pictures.

How do you organize physics? Here the answer is very cruel. You have should have a good understanding of physics. Let us look at one aspect of Wheeler's organizational talent.

From Wheeler's Statistical Mechanics (1960).

  • Tables. In addition to cartoons, Wheeler was quite fond of constructing tables. Tables constitute a very powerful language. It is a two-dimensional language. When I was fortunate enough to take his course on statistical mechanics in the spring semester of 1960.

    In one of his lectures, he summarized Maxwell's relations into one table like this. Have you seen this two-by-two organization of twenty equations anywhere else? It is a burden to memorize all those equations. With this table, we can firmly grasp the physical content of Maxwell's relations and venture into a more fundamental physical law. The secret of this table is the choice of the row and column variables.

    Perhaps I have a talent along this direction. If this is the case, I was able to find it only through Wheeler's tables.

    Feynman's APS talk of 1970.

    1. Feynman's Talk in 1970. At the APS meeting of 1970 held in Washington, DC, USA, Feynman gave a talk totally incomprehensible to most of the audience. I was there. To me it was the most interesting talk I had ever heard. My colleagues still tell me I am crazy to try to make sense out of this talk. But I was able to organize what Feynman said into this table. In this way, I was able to find out what I had to do to make a meaningful contricbution in physics.

    2. Between Maasive and Massless Particles. Did you know Wheeler was one of the pioneers of plasma physics? He made some fundamental contributions in fusion problems. He had to do statistical mechanics of relativistic particles. He was wondering why and how PV = (2/3) E for massive particles becomes PV= (1/3) E for massless particles. He talked about this problem and drew this table on the blackboard in his stat mech course in 1960.

      Wheeler's Plasma World

      Massive/Slow between Massless/Fast
      Energy
      Momentum
      E=p2/2m Einstein's
      E=(m2 + p2)1/2
      E=p
      PV
      Energy
      PV = (2/3) E Wheeler's
      Unsolved Problem
      PV = (1/3) E

      I am still interested in filling in the mathematical formula which will connect 2/3 to 1/3. But the problem is how to handle the averaging processes and resulting integrations.

      Perhaps we can solve somewhat easier problems without momentum/energy spread. If you read some of my papers, you must have seen the following table which I constructed with my co-authors. I love this table. You can now see how I was influenced by Wheeler.

      Lorentz-covariant World

      Massive/Slow between Massless/Fast
      Energy
      Momentum
      E=p2/2m Einstein's
      E=(m2 + p2)1/2
      E=p
      Spin, Gauge,
      Helicity
      S3
      S1 S2
      Wigner's
      Little Group
      S3
      Gauge Trans.
      Gell-Mann,
      Feynman
      Quark Model Lorentz-covariant
      Oscillators
      Partons

    3. Computer Screens as Tables. My website contains many webpages. You also have noticed every page is a matrix of information with row and column icons. The problem is what titles to put into those rows and columns.

    Physics of circles and ellipses.

  • Circles and Ellipses. If you do not know how to draw pictures, you can still draw circles and ellipses. It is fun to translate journal writings into circles and ellipses. In this day, we can gain deeper and more transparent understanding of physics.
    1. Dirac's Form of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. From 1927 to 1963, Paul A. M. Dirac published four major papers in his lifelong effort to combine quantum mechanics and special relativity. His papers are like poems with clean and clear mathematics. However, he never attempted to draw diagrams. Thus, it is profitable business to translate his papers into pictures. It is possible to do this only with circles and ellipses. In this way, we can transform those four papers into one paper.

    2. Quantum Optics. The Wigner function is now an indispensable tool in dealing with coherent and squeezed states. There, quantum optics becomes the physics of circles and ellipses.

      We can therefore use one scientific language for Dirac's form of quantum mechanics and the physics of squeezed states. Click here for a detailed story.

  • Power of Pictures. It is easy to find out strengths and weaknesses of other people, but it is very difficult, if not impossible, to find out about oneself. I was not an exception. Indeed, I had to struggle during the early years of my professional life. I was not happy to follow bandwagons. I started finding out myself in 1965. At that time, quantum bound states come from poles in the complex energy plane or from "bootstrapping" processes. Wave functions had nothing to do with physics. I was not able to accept this view.

    In 1965, the physics world was all excited about Dashen's calculation of the np mass difference. Roger Dashen, a young physicist of my age, became elevated by Princeton to the genius class. I was unhappy because of my Herod complex.

    The physics world had and still has a belief that the proton and neutron have the same mass but their mass difference comes from an electromagnetic perturbation. In his PhD thesis, Dashen came up with the correct value of this mass difference using the perturbation formula derived from the S-matrix theory.

    δ E = (φ good , δV φbad).
    Dashen's wrong calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference.
    In 1965, I published a paper showing Dashen's perturbation formula is based on one non-localized wave function as shown in this figure. I did not include this paper in my paper, and people did not believe what I was saying, because Dashen was a genius and I was something else (perhaps someone from a country that could not produce cars). Some people told me they would not accept my result because I was using wave functions instead of the S-matrix. Click here for details.

    At that time, I did not have a tenure, and my position was in danger because of this paper. I was looking for a job and had to give seminars at other institutions. While answering questions, I came up with this figure of wave functions, and was able to appreciate the power of pictures. To make a long story short, this figure saved my position in the United States. This figure also has a history from my undergraduate years at Carnegie Tech. The United States has been very nice to me since I came to Pittsburgh from Korea in 1954.

    This was a great revelation in my physics life. Pictures are powerful. Since then, when I write a paper, I first construct a set of figures, and the rest of the paper consists of figure captions. I got into Wheeler's track in this way. John Archibald Wheeler was much more than the black hole. First of all, he was a great teacher!

In physics, we draw cartoons to convey abstract ideas. Abstract ideas in turn are formulated from what we observe in the real world. Then digital cameras should play roles in formulating abstract ideas. These days, we have a very serious environmental problem. Fresh air and fresh water are disappearing. Physicists should worry about this problem. We can photograph these environmental problems.

Equally serious, perhaps so, is the disappearance of beautiful mind. Let us see whether we can photograph the abstract concept of beautiful mind.

Y. S. Kim (2008.5.12)


copyright@2008 by Y. S. Kim, unless otherwise specified.