Physical Basis for Feynman's Parton Picture
Before Einstein, the energy-momentum relation for massive particles and massless particles were E = p2/2m and E = cp respectively. Einstein combined these two separate formulas into one. As we know well, Einstein's work was not trivial.In 1964, Murray Gell-Mann invented the quark model in which hadrons are quantum bound states of more fundamental particles called quarks. Five years later, in 1969, Richard Feynman observed that a hadron, when it moves with a speed close to that of light, appears as a collection of infinite number of partons with a wide-spread momentum distribution. Partons interact incoherently with external signals.
It is only natural to regard the parton picture as a Lorentz-boosted quark model. However, since the partons are so different from the quarks, we have been wondering whether they are really Lorentz-boosted quarks.
- Further Contents of E = mc2
- Covariant Model
- Lorentz Boost
- Feynman's Decoherence
- Infinite Number of Partons
Further Contents of Einstein's Energy-momentum Relation
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
According to Feynman, the adventure of our science of physics is a perpetual attempt to recognize that the different aspects of nature are really different aspects of the same thing.
If this is the case, we are doing the same physics whether we do the
quark model or do the parton model.
Indeed, ever since Feynman presented his parton model in 1969, one of
the most pressing problems in high-energy physics has been whether
it is possible to formulate a covariant theory which will produce the
quark model for slow hadrons and the parton model for fast hadrons,
within the framework of the existing rules of quantum mechanics and
special relativity.
In this photo, one Feynman admirer is standing in front of Feynman's preterit at the entrance of the Feynman Computing Center at Fermi National Accelerator Center, Batavia, Illinois (June 2003). He has been doing Feynman's physics since 1970.
According to Ne'eman, Feynman diagrams and the parton model are the
two greatest contributions Feynman made. Feynman diagrams are well known and
well understood, but his parton model is yet to be understood. Why is it so
difficult to understand the parton model? It contains too much physics,
including some of the current issues such as decoherence, as well as future
issues.
How can we construct a covariant model for quarks and partons?
Let us start with a hadron consisting of two quarks bound together by a harmonic oscillator potential. The simplest wave function for this two-particle system is is the harmonic oscillator wave function. Can this wave function be Lorentz-boosted?Its boundary condition can be stated in terms of the spatial coordinates in a given Lorentz frame. Then how about other frames where the spatial and time-like coordinates are mixed? In order to deal with this problem, we need the time-separation variable. Does this variable exist? We are quite familiar with the Bohr radius. It measures the spatial separation between the constituent particles. Then, is there a time-like separation? According to Einstein, the answer is YES. This is the starting point of our plan to construct a harmonic oscillator wave function which can be Lorentz transformed.
Let us tackle this problem with the following three figures. The first
figure is a space-time diagram of the harmonic oscillator wave function.
The second figure describes Lorentz boosts in the light-cone coordinate
system. The third figure combines quantum mechanics with special
relativity by combining the first two figures.
in special relativity. This equation gives the hyperbola in the graph.
The above equation can also be written
The Lorentz boost along the z direction expands (z + t) and
contracts (z - t) while keeping the above product constant.
This is called Dirac's light-cone coordinate system. The
Lorentz boost is now a "squeeze" transformation.
In this picture of the Lorentz-squeezed hadron, the major axis corresponds
to the period of oscillation. It tells how often the quarks inside the
hadron meet. The minor axis tells how long it takes the external signal
to interact with the single quark. If the total energy of the hadron
is 1,000 times the mass, the ratio of the major axis to minor axis is
1,000,000. Thus, other quarks in the same hadron do not have a chance
to interfere with the quark interacting with the external signal.
Of course these can be explained in terms of mathematical formulas,
and they are given in many published papers. The following two review
papers may be helpful.
Let us look at this figure. If you are not
familiar with this figure,
Click here for explanation.
As the hadron is boosted, both the space-time and momentum-energy wave
functions exhibit the Lorentz-squeeze. As a consequence, quarks
become like massless particles moving with the speed of light.
Because of the wide-spread longitudinal distribution, the spring
constant appears like very weak, and quarks appear like free particles.
At the same time, the momentum distribution becomes wide-spread. If
free massless particles have a wide-spread momentum distribution, it
is like the black-body radiation: infinite number of massless particles.
Einstein and Feynman.
What do they say about this?
(z2 - t2) = constant
(z + t)(z - t) = constant.
Can you boost a quark-model wave function to get a
parton distribution?
This figure explains how a Lorentz-squeezed hadron become a collection of
partons.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 , 348 (1989).
Phys. Rev. 23 2781 (1981).
We are of course interested to know whether the parton
distribution calculated from the covariant oscillator
formalism is in agreement with the distribution
observed in the real world. This graph will indicate
that the answer is YES.
Feynman's Decoherence
One of the most puzzling aspects of Feynman's parton picture is that
while the quarks in the quark model are interacting coherently with
external signals, partons interact without coherence. A single parton
interacts with the signal without any interference by other partons
in the same hadron. Feynman observed this incoherence and explained
that this is due to the relativistic effect of time dilation. Can
this observation be made quantitative.
If the partons and the quarks are the same particles viewed from
different from different Lorentz frames, why is the number of partons
infinite while the number of quarks is two or three.